Syllabus

Title
1228 Course II - Theories in Ethics
Instructors
ao.Univ.Prof. Dr. Gabriele Mras
Contact details
Type
PI
Weekly hours
2
Language of instruction
Englisch
Registration
09/01/25 to 10/03/25
Registration via LPIS
Notes to the course
Subject(s) Bachelor Programs
Dates
Day Date Time Room
Wednesday 11/19/25 04:00 PM - 07:00 PM D4.0.047
Wednesday 11/26/25 04:00 PM - 07:00 PM D4.0.047
Wednesday 12/03/25 04:00 PM - 07:00 PM D4.0.047
Wednesday 12/10/25 04:00 PM - 07:00 PM D4.0.047
Wednesday 12/17/25 04:00 PM - 07:30 PM D4.0.133
Wednesday 01/07/26 02:30 PM - 09:30 PM D4.0.047
Contents

„Theories in Ethics” is an introduction into moral philosophy. The course focuses on the possibility of justifying criteria for the moral quality of an action. We will begin with Aristotle’s “Nicomachean Ethics”, move on to Immanuel Kant’s “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals”, and will then discuss John Stuart Mill’s criticism of Kant’s approach and his own suggestions — in “Utilitarianism”  — of what could count as criterion for assessing what is morally right or wrong.

The questions we will pursue are:
(1) Can eudaimonia, a „well lived“ life, be regarded as final end of all our actions? 
(2) does Aristotle refer to human nature as a foundation of considerations about “what one ought to do”. If so, what is humans’ “nature” according to Aristotle?
(3) What is “rationality” according to Kant?
(4) What is for Kant the “supreme” principle of moral action?
(5) Is it possible to deduce any criteria for assessing the rightness of an action from the formulae of the categorical imperative alone?
(6) what is “utility” according to J. St. Mill?
(7)  Is the greatest happiness determinable, i.e, can it represent a concrete goal in a society

Learning outcomes
  1. identify the basic theoretical problems in moral philosophy and the major approaches in the history of ethics
  2. critically analyze the foundations of ethical theory
  3. summarize in detail, both orally and in writing, the three major ethical theories
  4. evaluate the ways in which philosophers attempt to justify a criterion for acting morally
  5. try to apply the different ethical criteria in concrete cases 
  6. analyze the application suggested by others
Attendance requirements

This is a PI course (100% presence), which means that continuous assessment of student performance is carried out. Students will raise and answer questions in class and show further active participation (e.g. presentations) in class. It is a “blended learning” course, too. 

Teaching/learning method(s)

The course starts with a session in which administrative questions will be clarified. You will receive information about the structure of this course and should organize yourselves in “working” groups for the presentations.

I want everybody to stay “on Discussion”, if some questions are unclear! There is a text on Canvas ("Lecture Text") available, which should help you with your assignments.

Additionally, you should create (in small groups of max. 4) short video interviews to see, how other people assess the moral quality of concrete situations, use ethical approaches, and come to ethical conclusions. Instructions for the assignments will be given and discussed in class. 

Written feedback from me is always provided in “Discussion” on Canvas.

Assessment

1. 4 weekly assignments: 100 points
(no grading according to a 1-5 scale, just „passed“ or not). Please honor the deadlines (see Canvas), assignments that are turned in too late will receive less points: 1 day: 20%, 2 days: 50%.  

2. Group video presentations: 100 points
(includes presentation of the interviews: 40 points, transcription of 1 interview: 20 points, written summary of the interpretation of all interviews: 40 points ).

3. Questions and comments in the "Discussion"
(or class contribution over the whole term). Full engagement is necessary in order to get compensatory 10 points here) 

 

Points in total 210:

Excellent (1):        198 - 210 points
Good (2):              160 - 197 points 
Satisfactory (3):   120 - 159 points
Sufficient (4):           80-119 points
Fail (5):                          <80 points

Readings

Please log in with your WU account to use all functionalities of read!t. For off-campus access to our licensed electronic resources, remember to activate your VPN connection connection. In case you encounter any technical problems or have questions regarding read!t, please feel free to contact the library at readinglists@wu.ac.at.

Recommended previous knowledge and skills

Some philosophical knowledge or having attended the LV "Logic and methodology of social sciences"

Availability of lecturer(s)

ao.Univ.Prof.Dr. Gabriele M. Mras
Building D4, 3rd floor, room number D4.3.020
Tel.: 01-31336-4257
Email: gabriele.mras@wu.ac.at

Administration: Ursula Németh
Tel.: 01-31336-4775
Email: ursula.nemeth@wu.ac.at

Unit details
Unit Date Contents
1 19.11.2025

Intro into class, course overview, required readings

2 26.11.2025

A) ARISTOTLE

  1. Introduction
  2. Three Kinds of Life 
  3. Virtues Between Two Vices
  4. The Voluntary, Decision, and Responsibility
  5. The Virtues of Character
  6. Acting Against One’s Better Judgment
  7. Friendship
  8. What is the Best Kind of Life?
  9. Moral Virtue and Moral Psychology

B) (i) VIRTUE ETHICS  (ii) SOCIETY AND/OR HUMAN NATURE

  1. Sympathy and the General Point of the View
  2. Antiquity and Society
3 03.12.2025

C) KANT

  1. Acting from Duty
    • Required reading:
      • Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Preface and Section I
      • Kant: Grundlegung zur Metaphyisk der Sitten, Vorrede
  2. The Categorical Imperative
    • Required reading:
      • Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Section II, through 4:424
      • Kant: Grundlegung zur Metaphyisk der Sitten, Abschnitt 2
  3. The Kingdom of Ends
    • Required reading:
      • Kant: Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Section II, 4:425-440
  4. Modern and Moral Philosophy
  5. Critique of practical reason
  6. Moral Deliberation and the Derivation of Duties
4 10.12.2025

D) CONSEQUENTIALISM vs. A PRIORI ACCOUNTS OF MORALITY

  1. The Foundation of Morality
  2. Maxims and obligations
  3. Happiness for Everyone
  4. Mill Utilitarianism
  5. The Idea of a Moral Science
  6. The "Greatest Good for All" and the Question of a usable Criterion
  7. The Foundations for Moral Relativism
  8. Utilitarianism and the Virtues
  9. A Critique of Utilitarianism
  10. Some Ordinalist-Utilitarian Notes on Rawls's Theory of Justice by John Rawls
5 17.12.2025

E) OVERVIEW of the three ethical accounts presented, open discussion.

  1. Exhausted: How we can stop Lithium Mining from Depleting Water Resources, draining Wetlands, and Harming Communities in South America
  2. The rush to go electric comes with a hidden cost destructive lithium mining
  3. The Paradox of Clean EVs and the Dirty Lithium Mining Business
  4. Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling The Complete Guide
  5. What Are the Biggest Misconceptions of Universal Basic Income
6 07.01.2026

F) PRESENTATION of moral deliberations. Reading + Reading of your choice:

  1. Electric Vehicles 
  2. Social Media and Politics
  3. Affirmative Action
  4. Universal Basic Income 
  5. Is Affirmative Action Doomed 
  6. Affirming Affirmative Action
  7. Basic Income as a Policy Option
  8. Universal Basic Income Has Been

G) DISCUSSION of the application of "our" ethical theories

  1. Agrarian Justice
  2. Rights of Man
  3. Primer on Universal Basic Income
Last edited: 2025-07-21



Back